Skip to main content

Linked List Cycle Detection in Python | Floyd’s Tortoise and Hare Algorithm (LeetCode 141)

Linked List Cycle Detection using Floyd’s Algorithm (LeetCode 141)

Detecting a cycle in a singly linked list is a classic problem that can be solved efficiently using Floyd’s Tortoise and Hare algorithm.

Optimal Approach: Two Pointers (Cleaner Loop)

This is the most readable and interview-preferred implementation. It uses two pointers moving at different speeds.


class Solution:
    def hasCycle(self, head: Optional[ListNode]) -> bool:
        slow = fast = head

        while fast and fast.next:
            slow = slow.next
            fast = fast.next.next

            if slow == fast:
                return True

        return False
  

Alternate Implementation (Non-Cleaner Loop)

Below is a logically correct version that performs additional checks inside the loop to avoid null pointer access.


class Solution:
    def hasCycle(self, head: Optional[ListNode]) -> bool:
        slow_pointer = fast_pointer = head
        
        while fast_pointer:
            slow_pointer = slow_pointer.next
            fast_pointer = fast_pointer.next

            if fast_pointer:
                fast_pointer = fast_pointer.next
            else:
                break

            if slow_pointer == fast_pointer:
                return True

        return False
  

Time and Space Complexity

  • Time Complexity: O(n)
  • Space Complexity: O(1)

Full solution source code is available on GitHub: LeetCode 141 – Linked List Cycle

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

LeetCode 88 Explained: Four Approaches, Mistakes, Fixes & the Final Optimal Python Solution

Evolving My Solution to “Merge Sorted Array” A practical, beginner-friendly walkthrough showing four versions of my code (from a naive approach to the optimal in-place two-pointer solution). Includes explanations, complexity and ready-to-paste code. Problem Summary You are given two sorted arrays: nums1 with size m + n (first m are valid) nums2 with size n Goal: Merge nums2 into nums1 in sorted order in-place . Version 1 — Beginner Approach (Extra List) I merged into a new list then copied back. Works, but not in-place and uses extra memory. class Solution: def merge(self, nums1, m, nums2, n): result = [] p1 = 0 p2 = 0 for _ in range(m+n): if p1 >= m: result.extend(nums2[p2:n]) break elif p2 >= n: result.extend(nums1[p1:m]) break elif nu...

Introducing CodeMad: Your Ultimate Universal IDE with Custom Shortcuts

Introducing CodeMad: Your Ultimate Multi-Language IDE with Custom Shortcuts Welcome to the world of CodeMad, your all-in-one Integrated Development Environment (IDE) that simplifies coding and boosts productivity. Developed in Python, CodeMad is designed to make your coding experience smoother and more efficient across a variety of programming languages, including C, C++, Java, Python, and HTML. Whether you're a beginner or an experienced programmer, CodeMad is your go-to tool. In this blog, we'll dive deep into the workings of CodeMad, highlighting its unique features and easy installation process. The Power of Shortcuts CodeMad's intuitive interface is built around a set of powerful keyboard shortcuts that make coding a breeze. Here are some of the key shortcuts you'll find in CodeMad: Copy (Ctrl+C) : Duplicate text with ease. Paste (Ctrl+V) : Quickly insert copied content into your code. Undo (Ctrl+Z) and Redo (Ctrl+Y) : Correct mistakes and s...

Product of Array Except Self in Python | Prefix & Suffix Explained (LeetCode 238)

Problem Overview The Product of Array Except Self is a classic problem that tests your understanding of array traversal and optimization. The task is simple to state but tricky to implement efficiently. Given an integer array nums , you need to return an array such that each element at index i is equal to the product of all the elements in nums except nums[i] . The challenge is that: Division is not allowed The solution must run in O(n) time Initial Thoughts At first glance, it feels natural to compute the total product of the array and divide it by the current element. However, this approach fails because division is forbidden and handling zeroes becomes messy. This pushed me to think differently — instead of excluding the current element, why not multiply everything around it? That’s where the prefix and suffix product pattern comes in. Key Insight: Prefix & Suffix Products For every index i : Prefix product → product of all elements to t...