Skip to main content

Solution: LeetCode 27 — Remove Element

LeetCode 27 — Remove Element

Solution 1 (Optimal)

This version is in-place, single-pass, O(n) time and O(1) space. It preserves the relative order of kept elements.


class Solution:
  def removeElement(self, nums: List[int], val: int) -> int:
    p = 0
    for i in nums:
      if i != val:
        nums[p] = i
        p += 1
    return p

Solution 2(Optimal)

This version is in-place, single-pass, O(n) time and O(1) space. It preserves the relative order of kept elements.

class Solution:
    def removeElement(self, nums: List[int], val: int) -> int:
        l, r = 0, len(nums) - 1
        while l <= r:
            if nums[l] == val:
                nums[l] = nums[r]
                r -= 1
            else:
                l += 1
        return l
return l

Common Mistakes

  • Modifying the list while iterating with for x in nums plus remove or pop — this changes indices and skips elements.
  • Returning the modified list instead of the new length.
  • Trying to maintain order with an algorithm designed to minimize writes (e.g., two-pointer-swap) without noting that order won’t be preserved.
  • Using extra memory (creating a new list) when interview expects in-place solution.

Edge Cases

  • Empty array: nums = [] → return 0.
  • All elements equal to val: return 0.
  • No elements equal to val: return original length.
  • Mix of occurrences: both forward-write and two-pointer-swap handle these; forward-write preserves order.

Quick Comparison

Version In-place Space Order preserved When to use
Forward writes Yes O(1) Yes Default — preserves order, simple
Two-pointer swap Yes O(1) No When you want fewer writes and don't care about order

posted by Rohit Singh

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

LeetCode 88 Explained: Four Approaches, Mistakes, Fixes & the Final Optimal Python Solution

Evolving My Solution to “Merge Sorted Array” A practical, beginner-friendly walkthrough showing four versions of my code (from a naive approach to the optimal in-place two-pointer solution). Includes explanations, complexity and ready-to-paste code. Problem Summary You are given two sorted arrays: nums1 with size m + n (first m are valid) nums2 with size n Goal: Merge nums2 into nums1 in sorted order in-place . Version 1 — Beginner Approach (Extra List) I merged into a new list then copied back. Works, but not in-place and uses extra memory. class Solution: def merge(self, nums1, m, nums2, n): result = [] p1 = 0 p2 = 0 for _ in range(m+n): if p1 >= m: result.extend(nums2[p2:n]) break elif p2 >= n: result.extend(nums1[p1:m]) break elif nu...

Introducing CodeMad: Your Ultimate Universal IDE with Custom Shortcuts

Introducing CodeMad: Your Ultimate Multi-Language IDE with Custom Shortcuts Welcome to the world of CodeMad, your all-in-one Integrated Development Environment (IDE) that simplifies coding and boosts productivity. Developed in Python, CodeMad is designed to make your coding experience smoother and more efficient across a variety of programming languages, including C, C++, Java, Python, and HTML. Whether you're a beginner or an experienced programmer, CodeMad is your go-to tool. In this blog, we'll dive deep into the workings of CodeMad, highlighting its unique features and easy installation process. The Power of Shortcuts CodeMad's intuitive interface is built around a set of powerful keyboard shortcuts that make coding a breeze. Here are some of the key shortcuts you'll find in CodeMad: Copy (Ctrl+C) : Duplicate text with ease. Paste (Ctrl+V) : Quickly insert copied content into your code. Undo (Ctrl+Z) and Redo (Ctrl+Y) : Correct mistakes and s...

Product of Array Except Self in Python | Prefix & Suffix Explained (LeetCode 238)

Problem Overview The Product of Array Except Self is a classic problem that tests your understanding of array traversal and optimization. The task is simple to state but tricky to implement efficiently. Given an integer array nums , you need to return an array such that each element at index i is equal to the product of all the elements in nums except nums[i] . The challenge is that: Division is not allowed The solution must run in O(n) time Initial Thoughts At first glance, it feels natural to compute the total product of the array and divide it by the current element. However, this approach fails because division is forbidden and handling zeroes becomes messy. This pushed me to think differently — instead of excluding the current element, why not multiply everything around it? That’s where the prefix and suffix product pattern comes in. Key Insight: Prefix & Suffix Products For every index i : Prefix product → product of all elements to t...