Skip to main content

Maximum Average Subarray I – Sliding Window & Prefix Sum Optimization (LeetCode Explained)

Maximum Average Subarray I – Sliding Window Optimization Explained

While solving LeetCode – Maximum Average Subarray I, I initially implemented a straightforward sliding window solution. Although the logic was correct, it resulted in a Time Limit Exceeded (TLE) error. This problem became a good learning example of why optimization matters and how prefix sums can drastically improve performance.


Initial Approach (Naive Sliding Window)

My first solution calculated the average of every window of size k by slicing the array and computing the sum each time.

  • Array slicing takes O(k)
  • Summing also takes O(k)
  • This happens for each window → O(n) times

Overall time complexity becomes O(n × k), which causes TLE for large inputs.

This solution works logically but is inefficient due to repeated recalculation of sums.


Optimized Approach Using Prefix Sum

To avoid recalculating sums, I switched to using a prefix sum array. Each index in the prefix array stores the sum of elements from index 0 to i.

aux[i] = nums[0] + nums[1] + ... + nums[i]

This allows calculating the sum of any subarray in O(1) time.


Why Subtract aux[l-1] and Not aux[l]?

This was the most important realization and only became clear after doing a dry run on paper.

To calculate the sum of a window from index l to r:

sum = aux[r] - aux[l-1]

Reason:

  • aux[r] contains sum from 0 → r
  • aux[l-1] removes elements before the window

If we subtract aux[l], we incorrectly remove nums[l] itself, which belongs to the window.


Dry Run Example

Input:

nums = [1, 12, -5, -6, 50, 3]
k = 4

Prefix Sum:

aux = [1, 13, 8, 2, 52, 55]

Window [1 → 4] → [12, -5, -6, 50]

Correct sum:

aux[4] - aux[0] = 52 - 1 = 51

Wrong subtraction:

aux[4] - aux[1] = 52 - 13 = 39 (incorrect)

This confirmed that l-1 is mandatory.


Final Time Complexity

  • Prefix sum creation → O(n)
  • Sliding window traversal → O(n)
  • Total → O(n)

This optimized solution passes all test cases efficiently.


Key Learning

This problem reinforced an important pattern:

Prefix sum at index i represents the sum up to i, so to start a window at l, subtract l-1.

This concept appears repeatedly in sliding window and range sum problems and is worth remembering.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

LeetCode 88 Explained: Four Approaches, Mistakes, Fixes & the Final Optimal Python Solution

Evolving My Solution to “Merge Sorted Array” A practical, beginner-friendly walkthrough showing four versions of my code (from a naive approach to the optimal in-place two-pointer solution). Includes explanations, complexity and ready-to-paste code. Problem Summary You are given two sorted arrays: nums1 with size m + n (first m are valid) nums2 with size n Goal: Merge nums2 into nums1 in sorted order in-place . Version 1 — Beginner Approach (Extra List) I merged into a new list then copied back. Works, but not in-place and uses extra memory. class Solution: def merge(self, nums1, m, nums2, n): result = [] p1 = 0 p2 = 0 for _ in range(m+n): if p1 >= m: result.extend(nums2[p2:n]) break elif p2 >= n: result.extend(nums1[p1:m]) break elif nu...

Introducing CodeMad: Your Ultimate Universal IDE with Custom Shortcuts

Introducing CodeMad: Your Ultimate Multi-Language IDE with Custom Shortcuts Welcome to the world of CodeMad, your all-in-one Integrated Development Environment (IDE) that simplifies coding and boosts productivity. Developed in Python, CodeMad is designed to make your coding experience smoother and more efficient across a variety of programming languages, including C, C++, Java, Python, and HTML. Whether you're a beginner or an experienced programmer, CodeMad is your go-to tool. In this blog, we'll dive deep into the workings of CodeMad, highlighting its unique features and easy installation process. The Power of Shortcuts CodeMad's intuitive interface is built around a set of powerful keyboard shortcuts that make coding a breeze. Here are some of the key shortcuts you'll find in CodeMad: Copy (Ctrl+C) : Duplicate text with ease. Paste (Ctrl+V) : Quickly insert copied content into your code. Undo (Ctrl+Z) and Redo (Ctrl+Y) : Correct mistakes and s...

Product of Array Except Self in Python | Prefix & Suffix Explained (LeetCode 238)

Problem Overview The Product of Array Except Self is a classic problem that tests your understanding of array traversal and optimization. The task is simple to state but tricky to implement efficiently. Given an integer array nums , you need to return an array such that each element at index i is equal to the product of all the elements in nums except nums[i] . The challenge is that: Division is not allowed The solution must run in O(n) time Initial Thoughts At first glance, it feels natural to compute the total product of the array and divide it by the current element. However, this approach fails because division is forbidden and handling zeroes becomes messy. This pushed me to think differently — instead of excluding the current element, why not multiply everything around it? That’s where the prefix and suffix product pattern comes in. Key Insight: Prefix & Suffix Products For every index i : Prefix product → product of all elements to t...