Skip to main content

LeetCode 15 – 3Sum Explained (Two Pointer Approach)

LeetCode 15 – 3Sum (Two Pointer Approach)

Given an integer array nums, the task is to find all unique triplets [nums[i], nums[j], nums[k]] such that:

  • i ≠ j ≠ k
  • nums[i] + nums[j] + nums[k] = 0
  • No duplicate triplets are allowed

Key Idea

The problem can be reduced to a combination of:

  • Sorting the array
  • Fixing one element
  • Using the two-pointer technique to find the remaining two numbers

This transforms the problem into a repeated Two Sum search on a sorted array.


Step-by-Step Approach

1. Sort the Array

Sorting allows us to:

  • Use two pointers efficiently
  • Skip duplicate values easily
  • Stop early when the numbers become positive

2. Fix One Element

We iterate through the array and fix one element nums[i]. The goal becomes finding two numbers whose sum is -nums[i].

3. Apply Two Pointers

  • Left pointer l = i + 1
  • Right pointer r = n - 1

Move pointers based on the sum:

  • If sum is too small → move l forward
  • If sum is too large → move r backward
  • If sum matches → store the triplet

4. Skip Duplicates

To avoid duplicate triplets:

  • Skip duplicate fixed elements
  • Skip duplicate values for both pointers after a valid triplet is found

5. Early Termination

If nums[i] > 0, stop the loop. Three positive numbers can never sum to zero.


Python Implementation


class Solution:
    def threeSum(self, nums):
        nums.sort()
        result = []
        n = len(nums)

        for i in range(n - 2):

            if i > 0 and nums[i] == nums[i - 1]:
                continue

            if nums[i] > 0:
                break

            l, r = i + 1, n - 1
            target = -nums[i]

            while l < r:
                s = nums[l] + nums[r]

                if s == target:
                    result.append([nums[i], nums[l], nums[r]])

                    while l < r and nums[l] == nums[l + 1]:
                        l += 1
                    while l < r and nums[r] == nums[r - 1]:
                        r -= 1

                    l += 1
                    r -= 1

                elif s > target:
                    r -= 1
                else:
                    l += 1

        return result

Complexity Analysis

  • Time Complexity: O(n²)
  • Space Complexity: O(1) (excluding output)

Final Takeaway

The 3Sum problem is a classic example of combining:

  • Sorting
  • Two-pointer technique
  • Careful duplicate handling

Once this pattern is understood, it becomes much easier to solve related problems like 4Sum, Closest Sum, and other pointer-based array problems.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

LeetCode 88 Explained: Four Approaches, Mistakes, Fixes & the Final Optimal Python Solution

Evolving My Solution to “Merge Sorted Array” A practical, beginner-friendly walkthrough showing four versions of my code (from a naive approach to the optimal in-place two-pointer solution). Includes explanations, complexity and ready-to-paste code. Problem Summary You are given two sorted arrays: nums1 with size m + n (first m are valid) nums2 with size n Goal: Merge nums2 into nums1 in sorted order in-place . Version 1 — Beginner Approach (Extra List) I merged into a new list then copied back. Works, but not in-place and uses extra memory. class Solution: def merge(self, nums1, m, nums2, n): result = [] p1 = 0 p2 = 0 for _ in range(m+n): if p1 >= m: result.extend(nums2[p2:n]) break elif p2 >= n: result.extend(nums1[p1:m]) break elif nu...

Product of Array Except Self in Python | Prefix & Suffix Explained (LeetCode 238)

Problem Overview The Product of Array Except Self is a classic problem that tests your understanding of array traversal and optimization. The task is simple to state but tricky to implement efficiently. Given an integer array nums , you need to return an array such that each element at index i is equal to the product of all the elements in nums except nums[i] . The challenge is that: Division is not allowed The solution must run in O(n) time Initial Thoughts At first glance, it feels natural to compute the total product of the array and divide it by the current element. However, this approach fails because division is forbidden and handling zeroes becomes messy. This pushed me to think differently — instead of excluding the current element, why not multiply everything around it? That’s where the prefix and suffix product pattern comes in. Key Insight: Prefix & Suffix Products For every index i : Prefix product → product of all elements to t...

Best Time to Buy and Sell Stock – LeetCode 121

Best Time to Buy and Sell Stock – LeetCode 121 (O(n) One-Pass Solution) The Best Time to Buy and Sell Stock problem from LeetCode 121 is a classic array and greedy problem frequently asked in coding interviews. The goal is to maximize profit by choosing a single day to buy and a later day to sell. Problem Statement You are given an array prices , where prices[i] represents the price of a stock on day i . You may complete at most one transaction (buy once and sell once). Input: prices = [7,1,5,3,6,4] Output: 5 Input: prices = [7,6,4,3,1] Output: 0 If no profit is possible, return 0 . Key Observations You must buy before you sell Only one transaction is allowed The selling day must come after the buying day Approach 1: Brute Force (Not Optimal) The brute force approach checks every possible pair of buying and selling days and calculates the profit. for i in range(n): for j in range(i+1, n): profit = max(profit, prices[j] - prices...